Recently Sakshi Maharaj made a comment on Media that "I think Godse too was patriot". This statement was something like all hell broke on BJP and Sakshi Maharaj. While reading a newspaper today, I came across this view and that's why I'm writing on this topic.
When a parallel theory is developed and Rama is projected as assassin. Ravana is claimed to be great warrior and leader of tribals. When Mahisasur jayanti is celebrated and everything existing as general belief is toppled down, then this is called freedom of expression. Society should be tolerant enough to listen other's views. There can be two sides of a story. Everything what is possible to validate the claim is said.
That's is good and it should be done to protect the person. Only condition is that this all should not spread hatred among societies.
When a comment of this type was made, was it that much wrong which requires disruption of proceedings of parliament. Do everyone agrees with all the view of Gandhiji or as Venakiyaa Naydu said in parliament that everyday people strangulate the ideals of Gandhiji, are today making remarks.
Today I read complete speech of Godse which he delivered before the punishment inside court. If I go by his views what he expressed in speech, it seems he loved his country very much.
In a transition time when Jinnah was the only winner and everyone else was loser, feeling angry and making a person responsible for the act was what done by Godse. He made responsible gandhiji for all the suffering of Hindus and division of his motherland.
When someone showed solidarity towards a person who is a killer in most of the public eyes. What is correct method to protest. To stall proceedings or to give different view which is against the said version. These politicians are doing the same, what Godse did. Instead of giving his own theory he tried to remove the theory which is not in line with his views.
